Charlotte’s Wikipedia
October 27, 2006
“Awesome!” was the consensus of the class.
I agreed. A few weeks ago Alan November, a technology guru, spoke at my school and showed us a wikipedia entry started by a third grade class. Now, like many, I’m pretty skittish about wikipedia as a research tool. However, Alan made a good case for it as a teaching tool and so curious I sought out the Charlotte’s Web entry. As soon as I saw the lousy plot summary I knew I had a very cool lesson to do.
And so yesterday I asked my class what they knew about wikipedia. One child immediately told us his mother had recently used it to find an article for a conference talk she was giving. She’s a physician so presumably she found what she wanted — an example of wikipedia working. However, another child admitted that it hadn’t helped him the year before when researching the Middle Ages.
We then took a good look at that problematic plot summary. Here it is:
Spoiler warning: Plot and/or ending details follow.
Wilbur is the pet piglet of a young girl named Fern Arable. On the morning after he was born, he was going to be killed by Fern’s father John, because he was a runt in his litter of 11. Fern manages to persuade her father to let her raise the runt, whom she named Wilbur. Unfortunately, when he grows into an adult pig, Fern is forced to take him to the Zuckerman farm, where he will be prepared as dinner in due time.
Charlotte A. Cavatica, a spider, lives in the space above Wilbur’s sty in the Zuckermans’ barn; she befriends Wilbur and decides to help prevent him from being eaten. With the help of the other barn animals, including a rat named Templeton, she convinces the Zuckerman family that Wilbur is special by spelling out such descriptions as “Some Pig” in her web. Charlotte gives her full name as “Charlotte A. Cavatica”, revealing her as a barn spider, an orb-weaver spider with the scientific name Araneus cavaticus.
Written in White’s dry, low-key manner, Charlotte’s Web is considered a classic of children’s literature, enjoyable to adults as well as children. The description of the experience of swinging on a rope swing at the farm is an oft-cited example of rhythm in writing, as the pace of the sentences reflects the motion of the swing.
The children were outraged at the inaccuracies. “It’s Mr. Arable or John Arable, not John!” “Fern does way more than ‘persuade’ her father!” “They named Charlotte twice and it isn’t that important anyway.” “His litter size is not important!” “It was really Charlotte who saved Wilbur, not all the animals in the barn!” “Pet piglet?” “He isn’t grown up when he goes to the Zuckerman’s.” “No spoilers!”
The children and I went through it on the Smartboard, marking up things we wanted to change. (As you can see, we wanted to get rid of most of it!)
Then we rewrote it.
“Where’s Papa going with that ax?” asks eight-year-old Fern Arable to her mother one spring morning. It turns out that Mr. Arable is off to “do away with” a runty pig. Horrified, Fern softens him up and manages to save the pig. She names him Wilbur and tends to him as if she was his mother until he becomes too big and moves to Mr. Zuckerman’s barn.
Charlotte, a spider, lives over the door near Wilbur’s pen. She befriends him and, by weaving words such as “Terrific“ and “Some Pig” in her web, tries to convince the Zuckerman family that Wilbur is so unique that he cannot ever be killed for food.
White’s amazingly written, full-to-the-brim Charlotte’s Web is a classic all-American children’s book. Themes such as friendship, life and death, and nature make this book well worth reading.
Lastly I returned to the book’s wikipedia entry and replaced the old plot summary with ours. When I showed the children that it was on the wikipedia page for all to see the result was applause and the aforementioned, “Awesome!”
By now, less than 24 hours later, it has already been revised by someone else, but we are in the history now and you can still see our revision here!
Entry Filed under: Reading, Teaching, Web 2.0. Tags: Children's Literature.
13 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

1.
Ina Doyle | October 28, 2006 at 10:01 am
Great revision! Great lesson! Thanks for sharing.
Ina
2.
J. L. Bell | October 28, 2006 at 2:37 pm
Your class wrote great cover copy. Any paperback publisher in New York would be pleased with that text on the back of a book.
Unfortunately, an encyclopedia entry is a different literary genre.
3.
Megan | October 29, 2006 at 4:16 pm
I’m a member of childlit (although I don’t post often). I love your creative way to show both the positive and negative aspects of wikipedia! I’ve passed this blog entry on to some of the children’s librarians with whom I work
4.
storygeek | October 29, 2006 at 10:15 pm
Excellent article. I will be blogging about your class!
5.
Little Willow | October 29, 2006 at 10:48 pm
Three cheers for you and your resourceful students!
6.
medinger | October 30, 2006 at 5:27 am
Just to note that my lesson was about the workings of wikipedia (particularly the idea that anyone can both create and edit anything in it), not how to write a concise encyclopedia entry. And we were also revising the horrible plot summary that was there (and was left alone as ours was not for some reason) not starting from scratch.
If we weren’t already moving on to other things, I’d have the kids add some new sections to the entry, say on some of White’s research and personal background as it relates to the book’s creation. The current entry has that plot summary (now a truncated version of the one we did on Friday), a section on sales, another on movies, and (of all things) one on video games. If it isn’t any better by next year, I’m definitely going to have them do it when I teach the book!
7.
Kathy | October 30, 2006 at 1:28 pm
GREAT lesson. I am getting ready to talk about Wikipedia to my 5th grade students (I am a media specialist) and I might try an abreviated version of this (I only get them for 30 minutes a week!)
What grade was this?
Thanks for the great lesson idea!
Kathy
8.
medinger | October 30, 2006 at 3:39 pm
4th grade.
9.
Chery | November 2, 2006 at 1:59 am
Great information. I enjoyed reading this blog.
10.
Frances Jacobson Harris | November 30, 2006 at 11:09 pm
Fabulous, Monica! Much better than my own Wikipedia debacle…
11. Joyce Valenza’s Nev&hellip | December 4, 2006 at 7:39 pm
[...] Darren’s work leads me to wonder through what other curricular lenses we could view our world and its powerful images. I want to expand our Flickr art gallery. (Right now we have only one work up, but we are committed to building space for self and peer review.) But can we also annotate and further explore historical or news photos using Flickr notes and comments? And, just last night, my American Memory fellow buddy, Monica Edinger wrote to share her students’ success and excitement about the Charlotte’s Wikipedia project and her new blog, eduating alice. [...]
12. Storygeek » Blog Ar&hellip | April 3, 2007 at 6:57 am
[...] few weeks ago I ran across this blog entry by Monica Edinger who studies Children’s literature. Her fourth grade class [...]
13. Whadabout Wikipedia? &laq&hellip | May 5, 2007 at 9:12 am
[...] fall I did a cool lesson with my students; together we edited The Charlotte’s Web entry (just the plot section) and then watched as other…. I just took a look at the entry and see that it still needs a lot of work — plenty for next [...]