Thoughts on Newbery: Sensible Age Criteria

Children are defined as persons of ages up to and including fourteen, and books for this entire age range are to be considered.  (From the Newbery Terms & Criteria)

Thank goodness for that hard, but honest criteria.  I mean that really and truly even as I often butt my head up against it. Unlike some other awards (say one in particular — more on that in a second), the Newbery Award isn’t given to a book that appeals to a range of kids. Rather, a range of books is considered.  That means a book can win the award that is perfect for a twelve year-old and completely useless for a two year-old. Or wonderful for a six year old and tedious for a thirteen-year-old.

Yet evidently other awards don’t work this way at all.  Say the U.K.’s Blue Peter Award whose judges earlier this week took a book off their just-announced shortlist because it wasn’t “suitable” for their “core audience.”  The book is Andy Mulligan’s Trash which I thought was absolutely riveting and perfectly suitable for my core audience of middle grade kids.  A book that, were Andy American, would definitely be under Newbery consideration — it is that good.  Here’s a bit from the Guardian article on the tempest:

Trash is the story of a young street child who lives and works on a rubbish heap, and who finds himself on the run from the police. A statement from Blue Peter said the book should not have been shortlisted in the first place “because it contains scenes of violence and swearing that are not suitable for the younger end of our audience.” The programme-makers added: “We regret the mistake that was made in the initial judging but we do not believe the book is appropriate for children as young as six.”

Too bad.  And pretty lame too.  Now I may struggle to figure out if the language and sensibility of a particular YA book is right for an almost-fourteen-year-old, but at least I don’t have to worry about it being also suitable for a toddler.  Bad show, Peter.

About these ads

1 Comment

Filed under Newbery

One response to “Thoughts on Newbery: Sensible Age Criteria

  1. C. Sarette

    While I agree completely about Trash and Blue Peter, the trouble with the Newbery is how very, very, vanishingly rarely any book for children younger than middle school ever wins. I wish the age range ended at 12 so that they’d have to consider works for younger readers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s