Charlotte’s Wikipedia




“Awesome!” was the consensus of the class.

I agreed. A few weeks ago Alan November, a technology guru, spoke at my school and showed us a wikipedia entry started by a third grade class. Now, like many, I’m pretty skittish about wikipedia as a research tool. However, Alan made a good case for it as a teaching tool and so curious I sought out the Charlotte’s Web entry. As soon as I saw the lousy plot summary I knew I had a very cool lesson to do.

And so yesterday I asked my class what they knew about wikipedia. One child immediately told us his mother had recently used it to find an article for a conference talk she was giving. She’s a physician so presumably she found what she wanted — an example of wikipedia working. However, another child admitted that it hadn’t helped him the year before when researching the Middle Ages.

We then took a good look at that problematic plot summary. Here it is:

Spoiler warning: Plot and/or ending details follow.

Wilbur is the pet piglet of a young girl named Fern Arable. On the morning after he was born, he was going to be killed by Fern’s father John, because he was a runt in his litter of 11. Fern manages to persuade her father to let her raise the runt, whom she named Wilbur. Unfortunately, when he grows into an adult pig, Fern is forced to take him to the Zuckerman farm, where he will be prepared as dinner in due time.

Charlotte A. Cavatica, a spider, lives in the space above Wilbur’s sty in the Zuckermans’ barn; she befriends Wilbur and decides to help prevent him from being eaten. With the help of the other barn animals, including a rat named Templeton, she convinces the Zuckerman family that Wilbur is special by spelling out such descriptions as “Some Pig” in her web. Charlotte gives her full name as “Charlotte A. Cavatica”, revealing her as a barn spider, an orb-weaver spider with the scientific name Araneus cavaticus.

Written in White’s dry, low-key manner, Charlotte’s Web is considered a classic of children’s literature, enjoyable to adults as well as children. The description of the experience of swinging on a rope swing at the farm is an oft-cited example of rhythm in writing, as the pace of the sentences reflects the motion of the swing.



The children were outraged at the inaccuracies. “It’s Mr. Arable or John Arable, not John!” “Fern does way more than ‘persuade’ her father!” “They named Charlotte twice and it isn’t that important anyway.” “His litter size is not important!” “It was really Charlotte who saved Wilbur, not all the animals in the barn!” “Pet piglet?” “He isn’t grown up when he goes to the Zuckerman’s.” “No spoilers!”

The children and I went through it on the Smartboard, marking up things we wanted to change. (As you can see, we wanted to get rid of most of it!)


Then we rewrote it.

“Where’s Papa going with that ax?” asks eight-year-old Fern Arable to her mother one spring morning. It turns out that Mr. Arable is off to “do away with” a runty pig. Horrified, Fern softens him up and manages to save the pig. She names him Wilbur and tends to him as if she was his mother until he becomes too big and moves to Mr. Zuckerman’s barn.

Charlotte, a spider, lives over the door near Wilbur’s pen. She befriends him and, by weaving words such as “Terrific“ and “Some Pig” in her web, tries to convince the Zuckerman family that Wilbur is so unique that he cannot ever be killed for food.

White’s amazingly written, full-to-the-brim Charlotte’s Web is a classic all-American children’s book. Themes such as friendship, life and death, and nature make this book well worth reading.

Lastly I returned to the book’s wikipedia entry and replaced the old plot summary with ours. When I showed the children that it was on the wikipedia page for all to see the result was applause and the aforementioned, “Awesome!”

By now, less than 24 hours later, it has already been revised by someone else, but we are in the history now and you can still see our revision here!



Filed under Reading, Teaching

17 responses to “Charlotte’s Wikipedia

  1. Ina Doyle

    Great revision! Great lesson! Thanks for sharing.


  2. Your class wrote great cover copy. Any paperback publisher in New York would be pleased with that text on the back of a book.

    Unfortunately, an encyclopedia entry is a different literary genre.


  3. Megan

    I’m a member of childlit (although I don’t post often). I love your creative way to show both the positive and negative aspects of wikipedia! I’ve passed this blog entry on to some of the children’s librarians with whom I work :)


  4. Excellent article. I will be blogging about your class!


  5. Three cheers for you and your resourceful students!


  6. Just to note that my lesson was about the workings of wikipedia (particularly the idea that anyone can both create and edit anything in it), not how to write a concise encyclopedia entry. And we were also revising the horrible plot summary that was there (and was left alone as ours was not for some reason) not starting from scratch.

    If we weren’t already moving on to other things, I’d have the kids add some new sections to the entry, say on some of White’s research and personal background as it relates to the book’s creation. The current entry has that plot summary (now a truncated version of the one we did on Friday), a section on sales, another on movies, and (of all things) one on video games. If it isn’t any better by next year, I’m definitely going to have them do it when I teach the book!


  7. Kathy

    GREAT lesson. I am getting ready to talk about Wikipedia to my 5th grade students (I am a media specialist) and I might try an abreviated version of this (I only get them for 30 minutes a week!)

    What grade was this?

    Thanks for the great lesson idea!



  8. Chery

    Great information. I enjoyed reading this blog.


  9. Fabulous, Monica! Much better than my own Wikipedia debacle…


  10. Pingback: Joyce Valenza’s NeverEnding Search » Effective practice–scouting about in new frontiers

  11. Pingback: Storygeek » Blog Archive » Wikipedia Classroom Ideas

  12. Pingback: Whadabout Wikipedia? « educating alice

  13. Pingback: NCTE: Old Books — New Journeys « educating alice

  14. Pingback: ICT: Testing the reliability of website information | lynettegaye7

  15. Can you tell us more about this? I’d love to find out some additional information.


  16. Wonderful, what a website it is! This webpage gives useful information to us, keep it up.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.