Changing Communities, Changing Controversies

Linda Sue Park has just written on her blog about a situation in a suburban Boston middle school involving the use of Yoko Kawashima Watkins’ So Far from the Bamboo Grove in a language arts unit. The Boston Globe article about the controversy can be read here.

Linda Sue also also raised the issue on child_lit where I’ve just posted the following:

I think this was an accident waiting to happen. As communities continue to shift and change I anticipate more such controversies. And I think it is related to my oft-voiced and controversial contention that not only do works of historical fiction taught in classrooms need ample historical context , but that when they do involve crimes against humanity that these would be better addressed in history classrooms rather than English classrooms.

If the lesson was on autobiographical writing (according to J.L. Bell on child_lit) and if the population of the school has shifted and the book is now offensive to members of that population for very personal reasons then I suggest that a different book should be used for the English lesson and the controversial book be shifted to a unit in the students’ history curriculum where it would be looked at in all the ways it needs to be looked at. I cannot see how it could be used effectively as an example of autobiographical writing for students of Korean heritage if it is personally offensive to them. Just as I could not imagine teaching Little House in the Big Woods if my class included children of Native American heritage.

Years ago I started a thread here about an assembly at my school that included some scenes from Gilbert & Sullivan’s The Mikado which I had not know would be included and which distressed our Japanese students quite a bit. At the least I wanted to have been able to prepare them for it, but having not been forewarned could not. In my opinion, someone could have asked the opera company to either explain the scenes before doing them or skip them entirely given our school’s population.

Curriculum has to change all the time. It has to adjust to the
specific populations of a school and community. If this particular
community has changed and now includes those who have personal experience with this historical time then I think the community has been absolutely right in their efforts to grapple with it this way. I very much can imagine that children may well have been bullied and comments made that were offensive by other children out of limited understanding.

I’ve written here and elsewhere before of my feeling that the
Holocaust should be taught as history and not within English classes for similar reasons. Historians consider the past differently from literary scholars; there are different ways of doing so that students need to learn. Particularly when considering horrific historical topics like the one Watkins explores in her fictionalized autobiography. These would be better considered in history classrooms rather than within an English unit meant to address one aspect of the craft of writing.



Filed under Historical Fiction, History, Reading, Teaching, Writing

6 responses to “Changing Communities, Changing Controversies

  1. Claire

    Monica, I think this is an insightful and just terrific response. Thank you!


  2. Henry

    This is the most thoughtful and understanding post I have seen. I must admit, this is the first time I have ever blogged. I have been at the center of this issue from the very beginning. I have seen this issue get side tracked and lose its focus from time to time. Its not about the author, and to a certain extent, it is also not about the book. Rather, it is all about the children and how the book impacts them. You are absolutely correct, there are few Korean-Americans in this community now and the book has made the Korean-American children extremely uncomfortable. We are simply asking for the same thing you pointed out. Lets put the book in a more appropriate setting. This book is now read in 6th grade. It is our contention that this is too soon. Children do not have the necessary tools to discern what is fact and what is fiction. Also since this is taught in an English class, I am afraid the teachers also do not possess the necessary background in history to produce a balanced curriculum. We asked the book be moved in to a higher level history class. In this environment, the book will receive the necessary scruitny it deserves.


  3. Jean

    Dear Monica,

    This is a truly thoughtful response. I think this posting deserves wider audience. Do you mind if I share your posting with other parents?


  4. I’m glad people are visiting here and reading my post on this issue. However, please keep in mind that I was focusing on what I read about this ONE situation. I was commenting as a teacher who has had similar situations arise in her own school and who has spent quite a bit of time thinking about them. However, please do not use my post in any effort to remove this book from any school. That is not what I advocate at all.

    Rather, what I advocate is the constant reconsideration of curriculum in response to current events, particular classroom or school communities and needs. We educators need to always be doing this with all our curriculum all the time.


  5. Pingback: Rethinking So Far from the Bamboo Grove | The Marmot's Hole

  6. ChuChuTrain

    Koreans are racist towards Japanese and they wan’t Americans to feel the sam way.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.